Today I was listening to a lecture on some of the beliefs of Islam and one man's "tactics" for sharing the Gospel with them. In the lecture, the man (who is fluent in Arabic) was approached by a Muslim in a restaurant in the Middle East, and the Muslim overhearing his conversation and realizing he was American, asked him when he had become a Muslim. He told the Muslim that he wasn't, but that he was a "follower of Jesus".
"A Christian you mean?" asked the Muslim
"No, a follower of Jesus," replied the man.
He went on to explain that most Muslims associate "Christians" with the Crusades and the oppression that their people have suffered from "Christians" in the past. This man wanted to free himself from that stereotype to tell the Muslim what a real "follower of Jesus" is like.
Now I can understand the thinking behind this, and maybe even the effectiveness of it by drawing another's curiosity; but, the whole sound of it struck me funny. My thinking is that a "Christian" is what a Muslim says a "Christian" is in some sense, good, bad, ugly, or indifferent. I do want to associate with the men of the Crusades, not because I believe what they did was right, but because, in the end, they are still my brothers. I don't want to abandon association with the historical church because there have been times of grievous sin in it's past or because their have been tares mixed with the wheat. I would argue that if the name of "Christian" is wrongly viewed, it is our own fault and up to us to redeem it . . . not abandon it.
Thoughts, anyone?